As the debate rages on regarding the role of MBAs in the economic crisis, we look at some of the standpoints to consider and what the bottomline is.
The famous American author Mark Twain wrote in 1897 to the New York Journal, which had published his obituary, the famous words, “The report of my death was an exaggeration.” He went on to live another 13 years, to the ripe old age of 74. In similar style, reports of the death of the MBA, such as Lucy Kellaway’s column in The Economist of November 2009, are little short of an embellishment of the truth.
Nobody suggests that the recent economic downturn has had zero impact on business schools. The opposite is true. Deans and academics in top MBA programs worldwide, with a few exceptions, have been leading the clarion call for change. They want to be among the first to rectify the situation, most effectively and with a greater level of accountability.
It’s impossible to calculate accurately how many MBAs were at the core of the economic crisis, but in any case this over-simplifies the case and turns it into an unhelpful blame-game, a kind of corporate witch-hunt. It’s equally possible to argue that MBAs were at the forefront of trying to prevent the crisis. Perhaps even that they saw it coming but were prevented from action by those who were not so qualified - we will never know. Either way, the blame is shared by a relatively small group of people, including MBAs, politicians and various government regulators. What is agreed on is that reforms are absolutely necessary.
Get closer to your dream programme
Your consent preferences have been set.
Time to start exploring.
Your account has been removed.
You can still browse the site or sign up again once you have parental consent.
Get closer to your dream programme